Skip to Main Content

Predatory Publishing: Retracted articles

Is it predatory? How to determine whether or not a journal is predatory.

Retraction Watch RSS Feed

  • Weekend reads: On errors and consequences; AI in peer review; Canada’s PM accused of plagiarismThis link opens in a new window Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up past 500. There are more than 58,000 retractions in The Retraction Watch Database — which is now part of Crossref. The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker now contains more than 300 titles. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately … Continue reading Weekend reads: On errors and consequences; AI in peer review; Canada’s PM accused of plagiarism Mar 29, 2025
  • Former VA physician admitted to altering images and deleting data, documents showThis link opens in a new window A former cancer specialist sanctioned for “recklessly falsifying data” admitted during an investigation interview that he periodically altered images, documents obtained by Retraction Watch show. He also stated “he may have inadequately or improperly labeled and organized” image files, increasing the chances the images were confused or misidentified. Alan Lichtenstein, previously a staff physician at … Continue reading Former VA physician admitted to altering images and deleting data, documents show Mar 28, 2025
  • Why RFK Jr.’s pick for a vaccine-autism review may be familiar to Retraction Watch readersThis link opens in a new window When it comes to conversations about vaccines and autism, we always have plenty to write about. And the latest news that the Trump administration has tapped David Geier for a study on possible links between immunizations and autism, first reported by the Washington Post, is no exception. Geier has a long history of promoting the … Continue reading Why RFK Jr.’s pick for a vaccine-autism review may be familiar to Retraction Watch readers Mar 27, 2025

Retracted articles

Retracted articles

While not necessarily connected with predatory publishing, citing retracted papers can decrease the reliability and credibility of your own papers. While some databases and journal publishers do a good job of flagging retracted articles, others do not. Below are some tools to help you identify retracted articles.

Screenshot of notice of retracted paper in Zotero.

Screenshot of Zotero desktop app with red banner at the top of the window that reads, "An item in your database had been retracted. View Item." The retracted article is selected in the folder, and another red banner appears in the Info section of the article stating "This work has been retracted," below which are details about the retraction.

Retractions in Journal Publishers' websites

Retractions in Journal Publishers' websites

Journal publishers will often include the retraction notice along with the paper. See the example from a retraction in IEEE.

Screenshot of IEEEXplore web page for the article, Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication Principles: Single and Dual Loop Ring Oscillator Based Frequency Synthesizers for Broadband Tuner Applications

 

This example from  Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience shows another way that a retraction might be flagged by a publisher. In this example, a red box appears at the top of the page for the article with a warning of it's retracted status. See screenshot below.

Screenshot of web page for the article, 5G Massive MIMO Signal Detection Algorithm Based on Deep Learning. A red box appears at the top of the page with a red exclamation point icon and the text, "This article has been Retracted. To view the article details, please click the ‘Retraction’ tab above."

University of Nebraska-Lincoln Libraries
Hours of Operation | Parking Maps | Employment | Support the Libraries
318 Love Library | 13th & R | Lincoln, NE | (402) 472-9568
 @UNLLibraries |  @unl_libraries